Ackerman v. Fortis Benefits Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Ackerman v. Fortis Benefits Ins.

920 N.E.2d 366, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1434

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 22, 2010·No. 2009-1794·Published

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 23443. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for redaction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. No. 23443. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for redaction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

Ackerman v. Fortis Benefits Ins., 920 N.E.2d 366, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1434 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

920 N.E.2d 366 (Ackerman v. Fortis Benefits Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.