Ackerman v. Burch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ackerman v. Burch

41 A.D.2d 586

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 1973

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 586 (Ackerman v. Burch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ackerman v. Burch, 41 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument of appeal denied. Memorandum: This action has been pending since March of 1969. .The parties'have had. various motion proceedings and have twice appealed to this court. The sole •issue, the determination of which will terminate this protracted matter, is the simple question of whether an easement exists.- A trial should be had without ■ further delay.- Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer and Cardamone, JJ. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument of appeal denied. Memorandum: This action has been pending since March of 1969. .The parties'have had. various motion proceedings and have twice appealed to this court. The sole •issue, the determination of which will terminate this protracted matter, is the simple question of whether an easement exists.- A trial should be had without ■ further delay.- Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer and Cardamone, JJ. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ackerman-v-burch-nyappdiv-1973.