Ackerman v. Ackerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ackerman v. Ackerman

186 A.D.2d 523, 588 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11138

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.D.2d 523 (Ackerman v. Ackerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ackerman v. Ackerman, 186 A.D.2d 523, 588 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Friedenberg, J.H.O.), entered May 14, 1990, as, after a hearing, directed him to pay the plaintiff’s counsel fees in the amount of $4,500.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The hearing court gave proper consideration to the necessary factors in arriving at its decision that the defendant should pay his wife’s attorneys’ fees, and the award of $4,500 was in all respects proper (see, Burke v Burke, 118 AD2d 1022; Ahern v Ahern, 94 AD2d 53; Mattana v Mattana, 79 AD2d 702). Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Balletta, Rosenblatt and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Friedenberg, J.H.O.), entered May 14, 1990, as, after a hearing, directed him to pay the plaintiff’s counsel fees in the amount of $4,500.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The hearing court gave proper consideration to the necessary factors in arriving at its decision that the defendant should pay his wife’s attorneys’ fees, and the award of $4,500 was in all respects proper (see, Burke v Burke, 118 AD2d 1022; Ahern v Ahern, 94 AD2d 53; Mattana v Mattana, 79 AD2d 702). Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Balletta, Rosenblatt and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 523, 588 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ackerman-v-ackerman-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack