Ackerberg v. Kemelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ackerberg v. Kemelman

22 A.D.2d 665, 253 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 665 (Ackerberg v. Kemelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ackerberg v. Kemelman, 22 A.D.2d 665, 253 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

These appeals are consolidated and disposed of as follows: Judgment in favor of the infant plaintiff Kenneth Segal in the sum of $3,500 in a personal injury action and against the plaintiff Alexander Segal, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial ordered, with $50 costs to plaintiffs-appellants, unless defendants-respondenfs stipulate to increase the verdict in favor of the infant plaintiff Kenneth Segal to the sum of $5,000 and to the entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff Alexander Segal in the sum of $1,542.75, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $50 costs to plaintiffs-appellants. On this record the verdict in favor of the infant plaintiff is inadequate and inconsistent with the verdict against the infant’s father for medical expenses. Settle order on notice. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

These appeals are consolidated and disposed of as follows: Judgment in favor of the infant plaintiff Kenneth Segal in the sum of $3,500 in a personal injury action and against the plaintiff Alexander Segal, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial ordered, with $50 costs to plaintiffs-appellants, unless defendants-respondenfs stipulate to increase the verdict in favor of the infant plaintiff Kenneth Segal to the sum of $5,000 and to the entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff Alexander Segal in the sum of $1,542.75, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $50 costs to plaintiffs-appellants. On this record the verdict in favor of the infant plaintiff is inadequate and inconsistent with the verdict against the infant’s father for medical expenses. Settle order on notice. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 665, 253 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ackerberg-v-kemelman-nyappdiv-1964.