Acker v. Van Epps
This text of 45 A.D.3d 1104 (Acker v. Van Epps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered May 3, 2007 in Albany County, which granted defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment entered against them.
On August 16, 2004, plaintiffs allegedly sustained damage to real and personal property located in the Town of Guilderland, Albany County. In December 2006, plaintiffs commenced the present action against defendant Geoffrey B. Van Epps and defendants Hiawatha Trails Golf Course, Inc. and Hiawatha Trails, LLC—of which Van Epps is the principal and sole shareholder—by summons and complaint personally served upon Van Epps, claiming that water run off from their property caused plaintiffs’ property damage. Defendants failed to serve an answer or appear in the action and plaintiffs moved for a default judgment. There being no opposition, Supreme Court granted the motion. Thereafter, defendants promptly moved to vacate the default judgment, proffering the excuse that “the internal operations of the [defendants’ insurance underwriters failed,” and asserting as a defense a claim that weather conditions and road construction caused or contributed to plaintiffs’ property damage. Supreme Court granted defendants’ motion and plaintiffs now appeal.
“Vacatur of a default judgment lies within the discretion of the trial court, a determination that should not be disturbed unless it reflects an ‘improvident exercise of discretion’ ” (Chase Manhattan Automotive Fin. Corp. v Allstate Ins. Co., 272 AD2d 772, 773 [2000], quoting Lucas v United Helpers Cedars Nursing Home, 239 AD2d 853, 853 [1997]; see Kranenburg v Butwell, 34 AD3d 1005, 1006 [2006]). In order to vacate a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1), the movant must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see Kranenburg v Butwell, 34 AD3d at 1006; Chase Manhattan Automotive Fin. Corp. v Allstate Ins. Co., 272 AD2d at 773-774). Here, the record demonstrates that upon receiving the summons and complaint, Van Epps contacted his insurance agent, who immediately notified defendants’ insurance underwriter, Fairway Underwriters, by fax. Van Epps stated that he did not receive any further communication or correspondence concerning the action until he was notified of the default judg[1106]*1106merit against defendants in early March 2007,
Crew III, J.P., Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We note that the record before us contains no evidence of proper notice to defendants of plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.D.3d 1104, 845 N.Y.S.2d 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acker-v-van-epps-nyappdiv-2007.