Acker v. Anderson
This text of 193 A.D.2d 1121 (Acker v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The record discloses triable issues of fact whether defendants Clifford Anderson and Joseph Chimento, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have taken some evasive action to avoid the collision with plaintiff’s motorcycle (see, Gaeta v Morgan, 178 AD2d 732, 734; Tenczar v Milligan, 47 AD2d 773, lv denied 36 NY2d 645). The evidence also raises triable issues of fact whether defendant Gary Zgoda was negligent in forcing plaintiff toward the center of the road and whether Zgoda’s negligence proximately caused plaintiff’s injuries. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Lawton, Doerr and Boomer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 A.D.2d 1121, 600 N.Y.S.2d 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acker-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1993.