Acker Merrall & Condit Co. v. New York State Liquor Authority

282 A.D. 1013, 125 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5685
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Acker Merrall & Condit Co. v. New York State Liquor Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 A.D. 638

Opinion

Order denying appellants-respondents’ motion to dismiss the petitions affirmed, with costs to the petitioners-respondents-appellants, and the order annulling the determination of the Liquor Authority is modified to remit the matter to the Authority for further consideration in accordance with the opinion herein, with costs to the petitioners-respondents-appellants. Opinion by Peck, P. J. Breitel and Bastow, JJ., dissent in dissenting opinion. Settle order on notice. Order granting motion to punish Bob’s Corked Liquors, Inc., unanimously reversed and the petition denied. Order filed. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ. [Also printed ante, p. 638.— Rep.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acker Merrall & Condit Co. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 282 A.D. 1013, 125 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5685 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 1013 (Acker Merrall & Condit Co. v. New York State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.