Ackbar v. McPherson

678 F. App'x 187
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2017·No. No. 16-7391·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of defendants following a bench trial on Ackbar’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983' (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and Ackbar’s claims and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v. McPherson, No. 2:14-cv-02246-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ackbar v. McPherson, 678 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2017).

678 F. App'x 187 (Ackbar v. McPherson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related