Ack v. Firetog

11 A.D.3d 681, 782 N.Y.S.2d 920, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12489

This text of 11 A.D.3d 681 (Ack v. Firetog) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ack v. Firetog, 11 A.D.3d 681, 782 N.Y.S.2d 920, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondent Neil Firetog, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, from proceeding with the trial in a criminal action entitled People v Ack, pending in that court under Indictment No. 8756/02, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [682]*682[1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rush v. Mordue
502 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Holtzman v. Goldman
523 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 681, 782 N.Y.S.2d 920, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ack-v-firetog-nyappdiv-2004.