Acito v. Acito
This text of 4 A.D.3d 494 (Acito v. Acito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to set aside a separation agreement, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), dated September 3, 2002, which, inter alia, denied his motion to disqualify the defendant’s attorney.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to disqualify the defendant’s attorney (see Cohen-Davidson v Davidson, 255 AD2d 414 [1998]; Lazansky v Lazansky, 148 AD2d 501 [1989]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.E, Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.3d 494, 771 N.Y.S.2d 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acito-v-acito-nyappdiv-2004.