Acierno v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of Acierno v. Commissioner of Social Security (Acierno v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
LISA ANN ACIERNO, Plaintiff, Case No: 8:22-cv-2961-KKM-MCR KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.
ORDER In December 2022, Plaintiff filed this action against the Commissioner of Social Security. See Compl. (Doc. 1). The Commissioner now moves for entry of judgment with remand and Plaintiff does not oppose. Def.’s Unopposed Mot. for Entry of J. (Doc. 14). The Commissioner contends that remand is appropriate because the Social Security Administration will “reassess Plaintiffs residual functional capacity, further evaluate the demands of Plaintiffs past relevant work, offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, take further action to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision.” Id. at 1. When reviewing final agency decisions on social security benefits, the exclusive methods by which district courts may remand to the Commissioner of Social Security are set forth
in sentence four and sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292,
296 (1993). Under sentence four, district courts may “enter upon the pleadings and
transcript of record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Thus, for the reasons stated in the Commissioner’s motion, the Court
grants the motion. Accordingly, the following is ORDERED:
1. Defendant’s unopposed motion for entry of judgment with remand (Doc. 14) is GRANTED.
2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Plaintiff with instructions that the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and the case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the reasons stated in Defendant’s motion. 3. The Clerk is directed to close this case. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on May 24, 2023.
fatten Kamal Mirseht athryn’ Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Acierno v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acierno-v-commissioner-of-social-security-flmd-2023.