Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Acholonu v. Hobbs

Acholonu v. Hobbs

134 So. 3d 509, 2014 WL 628379, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2175
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 2014·No. No. 1D14-0236·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Hedrick v. State, 6 So.3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that a motion to disqualify is not deemed automatically granted by operation of the rule when the movant has failed to serve the judge as required by rule 2.330(c)).

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acholonu v. Hobbs, 134 So. 3d 509, 2014 WL 628379, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2175 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

134 So. 3d 509 (Acholonu v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hedrick v. State
6 So. 3d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)