Acholonu v. Hobbs
134 So. 3d 509, 2014 WL 628379, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2175
This text of 134 So. 3d 509 (Acholonu v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Acholonu v. Hobbs, 134 So. 3d 509, 2014 WL 628379, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2175 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
Opinion
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Hedrick v. State, 6 So.3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that a motion to disqualify is not deemed automatically granted by operation of the rule when the movant has failed to serve the judge as required by rule 2.330(c)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hedrick v. State
6 So. 3d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 So. 3d 509, 2014 WL 628379, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acholonu-v-hobbs-fladistctapp-2014.