Achinger v. Hans Hansen Welding Co.

196 F.2d 222
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 7, 1952·No. Nos. 11440, 11441·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These companion cases came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that decision is con- . trolled by certain questions of fact upon which the District Court made detailed findings which are not clearly against the preponderance of the evidence: The Cleveco, 6 Cir., 154 F.2d 605, 609; Larsson v. Coast[223]*223wise Line, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 6, 9, certiorari denied, 340 U.S. 833, 71 S.Ct. 55, 95 L.Ed. 612.

It is ordered that the judgments be, and they hereby are affirmed for the reasons stated in the findings of fact and conclusions- of law of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Achinger v. Hans Hansen Welding Co., 196 F.2d 222 (6th Cir. 1952).

196 F.2d 222 (Achinger v. Hans Hansen Welding Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Larsson v. Coastwise (Pacific Far East) Line
181 F.2d 6 (Ninth Circuit, 1950)
The Cleveco
154 F.2d 605 (Sixth Circuit, 1946)