Acharya v. Hauser

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 2012
Docket2011-1452
StatusUnpublished

This text of Acharya v. Hauser (Acharya v. Hauser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acharya v. Hauser, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BARUN ACHARYA AND XINGEN DONG, Appellants,

v.

RAYMOND HAUSER AND LONNIE E. HOLDER, Appellees. ____________________

2011-1452 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Interference No. 105,750. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JAY R. CAMPBELL, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were DON W. BULSON, TODD R. TUCKER, KYLE B. FLEMING and NICHOLAS J. GINGO.

THOMAS C. MCDONOUGH, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was LAWRENCE E. JAMES, JR. Of counsel on the brief were CHARLES L. GHOLZ and W. TODD BAKER, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Acharya v. Hauser, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acharya-v-hauser-cafc-2012.