Acharya v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

S.D. New York

Acharya v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

DecidedApril 27, 2022

Docket1:18-cv-08010

StatusUnknown

This text of Acharya v. 7-Eleven, Inc. (Acharya v. 7-Eleven, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acharya v. 7-Eleven, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

i SPAM SA a - pel APEPDY btp ees: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ee SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK “ ~~ eee oe ee eee □ nn nnn nn nnn nnn nn nnn nnn nnn nnn □□□ X ee es a4 locas □ DEVENDRA RAJ ACHARYA, Plaintiff, 18 CIVIL 8010 (MKV) -against- JUDGMENT JIMMY K. SOLANKI, Defendant. eee ene eee K

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated April 27, 2022, in reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed a report and recommendation to which no objections are filed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Colvin v. Berryhill, 734 F. App'x 756, 758 (2d Cir. 2018); Edwards v. Fischer, 414 F. Supp. 2d 342, 346-47 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). The reasoning and conclusions laid out in Magistrate Judge Cott's Report and Recommendation are sound and well-supported, and the Court, therefore, has fully adopted the Report and Recommendation. Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff in the amount of $48,680.58 in damages (consisting of unpaid minimum and overtime wages, and liquidated and statutory damages), plus prejudgment interest on $19,340.29 of the damages in an amount to be calculated upon entry of judgment, in the amount of $10,090.86, attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $25,596.70, and post- judgment interest on all sums; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York April 27, 2022 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

i SPAM SA a - pel APEPDY btp ees: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ee SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK “ ~~ eee oe ee eee □ nn nnn nn nnn nnn nn nnn nnn nnn nnn □□□ X ee es a4 locas □ DEVENDRA RAJ ACHARYA, Plaintiff, 18 CIVIL 8010 (MKV) -against- JUDGMENT JIMMY K. SOLANKI, Defendant. eee ene eee K

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated April 27, 2022, in reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed a report and recommendation to which no objections are filed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Colvin v. Berryhill, 734 F. App'x 756, 758 (2d Cir. 2018); Edwards v. Fischer, 414 F. Supp. 2d 342, 346-47 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). The reasoning and conclusions laid out in Magistrate Judge Cott's Report and Recommendation are sound and well-supported, and the Court, therefore, has fully adopted the Report and Recommendation. Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff in the amount of $48,680.58 in damages (consisting of unpaid minimum and overtime wages, and liquidated and statutory damages), plus prejudgment interest on $19,340.29 of the damages in an amount to be calculated upon entry of judgment, in the amount of $10,090.86, attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $25,596.70, and post- judgment interest on all sums; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York April 27, 2022 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Acharya v. 7-Eleven, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acharya-v-7-eleven-inc-nysd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack