Acfalle v. Tarusan

1 Guam 221
CourtDistrict Court, D. Guam
DecidedOctober 24, 1973
DocketCivil No. 87-A
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Guam 221 (Acfalle v. Tarusan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Guam primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acfalle v. Tarusan, 1 Guam 221 (gud 1973).

Opinion

ABBATE, Designated Judge

OPINION

Regalado M. Tarusan and Catalina H. Tarusan petitioned the lower court for the registration of a parcel of land known as Lot No. 2414-5 Maga, Municipality of Sinajana, Territory of Guam, pursuant to Section 1157 et seq. of the Civil Code of Guam. The petition was granted. Maria Q. Acfalle claimed an interest, but her interest in the said land was defeated by the lower court’s ruling. Maria Q. Acfalle now appeals on various grounds.

The Appellant’s principal contention was that the trial court erred in its failure to appoint an Examiner of Titles [222]*222to determine and solve the question of conflicting chain of title pursuant to Section 1157.10 of .the Civil Code of Guam. The Appellant, on appeal, admitted no such request was made and it is now being raised for the first time. The provision of Section 1157.10 of the Civil Code of Guam specifically states the court may, in its discretion, appoint an Examiner of Titles, a purely discretionary act on the part of the court.

Judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Guam 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acfalle-v-tarusan-gud-1973.