Acf Industries, Inc. v. Department Of Revenue Of The State Of Oregon

25 F.3d 823, 94 Daily Journal DAR 7316, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3941, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12542
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Acf Industries, Inc. v. Department Of Revenue Of The State Of Oregon. Read the opinion of the Court — 961 F.2d 813
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 1, 1994·No. 90-35402·Published

Opinion

25 F.3d 823

ACF INDUSTRIES, INC.; General American Transportation
Corporation; General Electric Railcar Services Corporation,
Pullman Leasing Company; Railbox Company; Railgon Company;
Trailer Train Company; Union Tank Car Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF the STATE OF OREGON, Richard A.
Munn, in his capacity as Director of the
Department of Revenue of the State of
Oregon, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-35402.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

June 1, 1994.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: JAMES R. BROWNING, CANBY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

The judgment of this court, 961 F.2d 813, has been reversed. Therefore, this case is ordered remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Department of Revenue of Oregon v. ACF Industries, Inc., et al., --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 843, 127 L.Ed.2d 165 (1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acf Industries, Inc. v. Department Of Revenue Of The State Of Oregon, 25 F.3d 823, 94 Daily Journal DAR 7316, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3941, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12542 (9th Cir. 1994).

25 F.3d 823 (Acf Industries, Inc. v. Department Of Revenue Of The State Of Oregon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related