Acf Industries, Inc. v. Department Of Revenue Of The State Of Oregon
This text of 25 F.3d 823 (Acf Industries, Inc. v. Department Of Revenue Of The State Of Oregon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACF INDUSTRIES, INC.; General American Transportation
Corporation; General Electric Railcar Services Corporation,
Pullman Leasing Company; Railbox Company; Railgon Company;
Trailer Train Company; Union Tank Car Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF the STATE OF OREGON, Richard A.
Munn, in his capacity as Director of the
Department of Revenue of the State of
Oregon, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-35402.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
June 1, 1994.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before: JAMES R. BROWNING, CANBY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
The judgment of this court, 961 F.2d 813, has been reversed. Therefore, this case is ordered remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Department of Revenue of Oregon v. ACF Industries, Inc., et al., --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 843, 127 L.Ed.2d 165 (1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 F.3d 823, 94 Daily Journal DAR 7316, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3941, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acf-industries-inc-v-department-of-revenue-of-the-state-of-oregon-ca9-1994.