Acevedo v. Wing

269 A.D.2d 339, 703 N.Y.S.2d 720, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2244
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 29, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 339 (Acevedo v. Wing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acevedo v. Wing, 269 A.D.2d 339, 703 N.Y.S.2d 720, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered on or about October 26, 1998, which denied as untimely petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees under the New York State Equal Access to Justice Act ([EAJA] CPLR art 86), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s request for attorney’s fees is time-barred since she did not seek such fees within 30 days of respondent State of New York Department of Social Services’ Decision on Stipulation After Fair Hearing, which constituted a “settlement” within the meaning of the EAJA (see, CPLR 8601 [b]; 8602 [c]). Concur — Williams, J. P., Wallach, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Mundell v. New York State Dept. of Transp.
2020 NY Slip Op 4099 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 339, 703 N.Y.S.2d 720, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acevedo-v-wing-nyappdiv-2000.