Acevedo v. Warner

Fourth Circuit

Acevedo v. Warner

155 F. App'x 95

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2005·No. No. 05-6871·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jaime Acevedo appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Acevedo v. Warner, No. CA-03-526-7-Jct-mfu (WD.Va. filed Mar. 29, 2005 & entered Mar. 30, 2005; filed Apr. 20, 2005 & entered Apr. 21, 2005; filed June 1, 2005 & entered June 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. .

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jaime Acevedo appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Acevedo v. Warner, No. CA-03-526-7-Jct-mfu (WD.Va. filed Mar. 29, 2005 & entered Mar. 30, 2005; filed Apr. 20, 2005 & entered Apr. 21, 2005; filed June 1, 2005 & entered June 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. .

AFFIRMED

Acevedo v. Warner, 155 F. App'x 95 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

155 F. App'x 95 (Acevedo v. Warner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related