Acevedo v. Gilmore
188 F. App'x 202
Opinion
Jaime Acevedo appeals numerous orders of the district court and the jury’s verdict in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Acevedo v. Gilmore, 188 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2006).
188 F. App'x 202 (Acevedo v. Gilmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983