Acevedo v. City of Bridgeton
Opinion
Michael Acevedo appeals the district court’s1 orders dismissing one defendant and granting summary judgment in favor of the remaining defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After carefully reviewing the record de novo and considering Acevedo’s arguments for reversal, see Mann v. Yarnell, 497 F.3d 822, 825 (8th Cir.2007) (de novo review of summary judgment); Koehler v. Brody, 483 F.3d 590, 596 (8th Cir.2007) (de novo review of dismissal for failure to state claim), we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny appellees’ motion to dismiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
283 F. App'x 420 (Acevedo v. City of Bridgeton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.