Acevedo (David) v. State
This text of Acevedo (David) v. State (Acevedo (David) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DAVID GABRIEL ACEVEDO, No. 73225 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a "district court order granting or denying motion for house arrest." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge. Our review of this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects. Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order granting or denying a motion for house arrest. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 11.35 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Further, review of the district court minutes and docket entries indicate that no such order was entered. To the extent that appellant appeals from the judgment of conviction, the notice of appeal was untimely filed. NRAP 4(b); NRAP 26(a); NRAP 36(c). "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge David Gabriel Acevedo Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Acevedo (David) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acevedo-david-v-state-nev-2017.