Aceto v. Convertino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aceto v. Convertino

124 A.D.2d 1015, 508 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62352

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 124 A.D.2d 1015 (Aceto v. Convertino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aceto v. Convertino, 124 A.D.2d 1015, 508 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: Respondent’s determination to terminate petitioner’s employment was supported by substantial evidence in the record and did not constitute a disproportionate penalty. However, respondent should pay petitioner the salary he would have earned between August 1, 1984 and December 12, 1984, less any compensation derived from other employment during that period and any unemployment benefits received for that period (Civil Service Law § 75 [3]; Matter of Sinicropi v Bennett, 60 NY2d 918). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: Respondent’s determination to terminate petitioner’s employment was supported by substantial evidence in the record and did not constitute a disproportionate penalty. However, respondent should pay petitioner the salary he would have earned between August 1, 1984 and December 12, 1984, less any compensation derived from other employment during that period and any unemployment benefits received for that period (Civil Service Law § 75 [3]; Matter of Sinicropi v Bennett, 60 NY2d 918). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A.D.2d 1015, 508 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aceto-v-convertino-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack