Aceto Chemical Co. v. United States
This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 675 (Aceto Chemical Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal for reappraisement relates to a certain coal-tar product described on the invoice as “Aceto Acetanilide.”
When the case was called for trial, Government counsel moved for dismissal on the ground that the appeal was not filed within 30 days after written notice of the appraisement of this merchandise, as required under the provisions of section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Counsel for plaintiff conceded that the motion to dismiss is good.
Accordingly, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed as untimely, and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Cust. Ct. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aceto-chemical-co-v-united-states-cusc-1961.