Ace Property & Casualty Insurance v. Federal-Mogul Corp.

55 A.D.3d 479, 866 N.Y.S.2d 188
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 30, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 55 A.D.3d 479 (Ace Property & Casualty Insurance v. Federal-Mogul Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ace Property & Casualty Insurance v. Federal-Mogul Corp., 55 A.D.3d 479, 866 N.Y.S.2d 188 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered November 1, 2007, which, in a declaratory judgment action involving plaintiff insurers’ coverage obligations for bodily injury claims arising out of alleged exposure to asbestos-containing products that were manufactured, sold or distributed by defendants-respondents’ predecessor in interest, insofar as appealed from, granted the motions of defendants Federal-Mogul Corporation and Federal-Mogul Products, Inc. (Federal-Mogul) and Magnetek, Inc. to stay the action to abide an action in New Jersey involving the same subject matter and many of the same parties, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[480]*480The insurers fail to show that the first-filed New Jersey action is vexatious, oppressive or was instituted to obtain some unjust advantage, that New York’s interests in this dispute predominate over New Jersey’s, or other reason for deviating from the generally followed first-in-time rule (see White Light Prods, v On The Scene Prods., 231 AD2d 90, 96-97 [1997]), under which “the court which has first taken jurisdiction is the one in which the matter should be determined and it is a violation of the rules of comity to interfere” (id. at 96 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). We have considered the insurers’ other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Williams, Buckley and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finch Prop. Holdings I, LLP v. Blumenfeld
2025 NY Slip Op 00190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Space Race LLC v. Alabama Space Science Exhibit
2020 NY Slip Op 3716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.3d 479, 866 N.Y.S.2d 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ace-property-casualty-insurance-v-federal-mogul-corp-nyappdiv-2008.