Ace Mech. Inc. v. Holloway

2015 Ark. App. 107
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 18, 2015
DocketCV-14-881
StatusPublished

This text of 2015 Ark. App. 107 (Ace Mech. Inc. v. Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ace Mech. Inc. v. Holloway, 2015 Ark. App. 107 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 107

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-14-881

ACE MECHANICAL, INC.; Opinion Delivered February 18, 2015 FIRSTCOMP INSURANCE COMPANY; AND DEATH & APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY WORKERS’ COMPENSATION TRUST FUND COMMISSION APPELLANTS [NO. F701339]

V.

KENNY HOLLOWAY AFFIRMED APPELLEE

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

Ace Mechanical, Inc., appeals the September 8, 2014 decision of the Arkansas

Workers’ Compensation Commission that awarded Kenneth Holloway additional benefits in

the form of pain management for his compensable back injury. Ace Mechanical contends that

substantial evidence does not support the award for pain management that was prescribed six

years after his compensable back surgery.

The Commission’s decision summarizes Holloway’s testimony, a functional-capacity

evaluation, and relevant medical records. Further, the Commission exercised its duty to make

determinations of credibility, weigh the evidence, and resolve any conflicts in the testimony

and evidence. Ark. Methodist Med. Ctr. v. Blansett, 2013 Ark. App. 480. Because the only

issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence and because the opinion of the Commission

thoroughly explains its decision, we affirm by memorandum opinion pursuant to sections (a) Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 107

and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985).

Affirmed.

VIRDEN and GLOVER, JJ., agree.

Anderson, Murphy & Hopkins, L.L.P., by: Randy P. Murphy and Mark D. Wankum, for

appellants.

Walker, Shock & Harp, PLLC, by: Eddie H. Walker, Jr., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ark. Methodist Med. Ctr. v. Blansett
2013 Ark. App. 480 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2013)
In Re Memorandum Opinions
700 S.W.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. App. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ace-mech-inc-v-holloway-arkctapp-2015.