Ace Beer Distributors, Inc. v. Stroh Brewery Company, Inc., Ace Beer Distributors, Inc. v. Kohn, Inc.

280 F.2d 424, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 27, 1960
Docket026
StatusPublished

This text of 280 F.2d 424 (Ace Beer Distributors, Inc. v. Stroh Brewery Company, Inc., Ace Beer Distributors, Inc. v. Kohn, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ace Beer Distributors, Inc. v. Stroh Brewery Company, Inc., Ace Beer Distributors, Inc. v. Kohn, Inc., 280 F.2d 424, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714 (6th Cir. 1960).

Opinion

280 F.2d 424

ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STROH BREWERY COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant.
v.
KOHN, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 14,025, 14,026.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 27, 1960.

Myron Krotinger, Cleveland, Ohio, Mendelsohn, Krotinger & Lane, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for Ace Beer Distributors, Inc.

Rockwell T. Gust, Detroit, Mich., Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Kennedy, Detroit, Mich., Arter, Hadden, Wykoff & Van Duzer, Cleveland, Ohio, for Stroh Brewery, Co., Inc.

C. Kenneth Clark, Youngstown, Ohio, Harrington, Huxley & Smith, Youngstown, Ohio, Charles G. Schnur, Akron, Ohio, of counsel, for Kohn, Inc., and others.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Senior Circuit Judge, and WEICK, Circuit Judg.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on an appeal from orders denying petitions for preliminary injunctions in the above cases, and after hearing the case upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and after due consideration of the reasons set forth in the oral ruling of the Court denying the issuance of the preliminary injunctions, and the Court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the orders of the District Court denying preliminary injunctions in the above cases be and are hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 F.2d 424, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ace-beer-distributors-inc-v-stroh-brewery-company-inc-ace-beer-ca6-1960.