Ace American Insurance Company v. Emmet Coating Services, Inc.
731 N.W.2d 746, 478 Mich. 871
Opinion
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and Allianz Insurance Company, Plaintiffs,
v.
EMMET COATING SERVICES, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc., a/k/a Hyster Group, and Amerigas Propane, Inc., Defendants/Cross-Defendants, and
Worthington Industries, Inc., d/b/a Worthington Cylinders Corporation, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendant, and
Selective Insurance Company, Ellison, Neilson, Zehe & Antas, P.C., Great Lakes Power Products, Inc., Cardelli, Hebert, Lanfear & Buikema, Michigan Industrial Forklifts, Inc., and Forklift Tire of Michigan, Third-Party Defendants, and
Herndon & Associates, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we *747 are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ace American Insurance Company v. Emmet Coating Services, Inc., 731 N.W.2d 746, 478 Mich. 871 (Mich. 2007).
731 N.W.2d 746 (Ace American Insurance Company v. Emmet Coating Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Casey v. ASU GROUP
731 N.W.2d 746 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)