ACD Corp. v. Walker

413 So. 2d 33, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28066
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 1981·No. No. VV-279·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

On Attorney’s Fees

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration, claimant’s request for attorney’s fees is denied. We have previously determined that Rule 9.400(b), Fla. R.App.P., requires that a motion for attorney’s fees be filed separately. See Florida Dept. of Commerce v. Davies, 379 So.2d 1313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Wallace v. Walton Context Building, 383 So.2d 729 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Munroe Memorial Hospital v. Thompson, 388 So.2d 1338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

SHIVERS, SHAW and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ACD Corp. v. Walker, 413 So. 2d 33, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28066 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

413 So. 2d 33 (ACD Corp. v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zane Paul Webber v. State of Florida, Dept. of Business etc.
198 So. 3d 922 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Sigg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
594 So. 2d 329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)