Accurso v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Accurso v. Division of Employment Security

489 S.W.3d 917, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 511, 2016 WL 2907897

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 17, 2016·No. WD 78749·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Diane Ac,curso appeals the denial of her claim for unemployment benefits. Accurso worked as a school bus driver for the Platte County District R-III School. She was dismissed from employment with the District. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission found that she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Diane Ac,curso appeals the denial of her claim for unemployment benefits. Accurso worked as a school bus driver for the Platte County District R-III School. She was dismissed from employment with the District. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission found that she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

Accurso v. Division of Employment Security, 489 S.W.3d 917, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 511, 2016 WL 2907897 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

489 S.W.3d 917 (Accurso v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.