Accuprobe, Inc. v. Earth Search Sciences, Inc.

S.D. New York

Accuprobe, Inc. v. Earth Search Sciences, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 2, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-11871·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED ACCUPROBE, INC. and JAN M. ARNETT, DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/2/2020 Plaintiffs, -against- 1:18-cv-11871 (MKV) EARTH SEARCH SCIENCES, INC., ORDER GENERAL SYNFUELS INTERNATIONAL, INC., and LARRY VANCE, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: On September 2, 2020, the Court granted a motion by counsel to Plaintiffs to withdraw from their representation in this action. See ECF #63. In the order granting withdrawal, the Court instructed Plaintiff Jan Arnett that he would either need to obtain new counsel or proceed pro se. Id. at 1. The Court noted that the corporate Plaintiff cannot proceed pro se. See Jones v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth., 722 F.2d 20, 22 (2d Cir. 1983) (noting that a corporation cannot proceed pro se). Plaintiff Arnett was ordered to show cause on or before September 14, 2020 why the corporate Plaintiff, Accuprobe, Inc., should not be dismissed from this action. To date, the Court has not received anything from Mr. Arnett. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the claims of Accuprobe, Inc. are dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

Date: October 2, 2020 MARY AY vifxoct New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED ACCUPROBE, INC. and JAN M. ARNETT, DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/2/2020 Plaintiffs, -against- 1:18-cv-11871 (MKV) EARTH SEARCH SCIENCES, INC., ORDER GENERAL SYNFUELS INTERNATIONAL, INC., and LARRY VANCE, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: On September 2, 2020, the Court granted a motion by counsel to Plaintiffs to withdraw from their representation in this action. See ECF #63. In the order granting withdrawal, the Court instructed Plaintiff Jan Arnett that he would either need to obtain new counsel or proceed pro se. Id. at 1. The Court noted that the corporate Plaintiff cannot proceed pro se. See Jones v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth., 722 F.2d 20, 22 (2d Cir. 1983) (noting that a corporation cannot proceed pro se). Plaintiff Arnett was ordered to show cause on or before September 14, 2020 why the corporate Plaintiff, Accuprobe, Inc., should not be dismissed from this action. To date, the Court has not received anything from Mr. Arnett. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the claims of Accuprobe, Inc. are dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

Date: October 2, 2020 MARY AY vifxoct New York, NY United States District Judge

Accuprobe, Inc. v. Earth Search Sciences, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Accuprobe, Inc. v. Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (Accuprobe, Inc. v. Earth Search Sciences, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.