Accounts Receivable Solutions, Inc. v. Parrino & Mateo Chiropractic, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Accounts Receivable Solutions, Inc. v. Parrino & Mateo Chiropractic, P.C.

23 A.D.3d 321, 804 N.Y.S.2d 757

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 7, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Parrino and Mateo Chiropractic, PC., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Shapiro, J.), dated November 12, 2004, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to strike its answer pursuant to CPLR 3126.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order dated November 12, 2004, must be dismissed as the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment dated June 8, 2005, in the action [322] (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). Appellate review of the intermediate order is now available only on appeal from the judgment. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Parrino and Mateo Chiropractic, PC., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Shapiro, J.), dated November 12, 2004, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to strike its answer pursuant to CPLR 3126.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order dated November 12, 2004, must be dismissed as the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment dated June 8, 2005, in the action [322] (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). Appellate review of the intermediate order is now available only on appeal from the judgment. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Accounts Receivable Solutions, Inc. v. Parrino & Mateo Chiropractic, P.C., 23 A.D.3d 321, 804 N.Y.S.2d 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

23 A.D.3d 321 (Accounts Receivable Solutions, Inc. v. Parrino & Mateo Chiropractic, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related