Accomando Vs. Accomando

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 13, 2021
Docket83716
StatusPublished

This text of Accomando Vs. Accomando (Accomando Vs. Accomando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Accomando Vs. Accomando, (Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARIO ACCOMANDO, No. 83716 Appellant, vs. GEORGANN ROSE ACCOMANDO, FILED Respondent. DEC 13 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY •\10-4-4-14-41k./ DEPUTY CLERX 0 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order awarding temporary spousal support and making other temporary orders. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Amy Mastin, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The challenged order is not appealable. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule); see generally In re Ternporary Custody of Five Minor Children, 105 Nev. 441, 777 P.2d 901 (1989) (stating that no appeal may be taken from a temporary order subject to periodic mandatory review). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Cadish

Herndon

el) - 36 cc: Hon. Amy Mastin, District Judge, Family Court Division Mario Accomando Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC. Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC
301 P.3d 850 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)
August H. v. State
777 P.2d 901 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Accomando Vs. Accomando, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/accomando-vs-accomando-nev-2021.