Accomando v. Accomando

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARIO ACCOMANDO, No. 84097 Appellant,

vS.

GEORGANN ROSE ACCOMANDO,

Respondent.

FILED FEB 1 1 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By "5

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order entered on October 15, 2021. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Amy Mastin, Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal and other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. No district court order was entered on October 15, 2021. To the extent appellant is attempting to appeal from the cancellation of a hearing on his motion to determine respondent's mental health, such a cancellation is not appealable. See Brown v. WIC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court „

may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule").

Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Stiglich Herndon SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I 947A 407.4P4.-

- ozI613

cc: Hon. Amy Mastin, District Judge, Family Court Division Mario Accomando Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A cOatt,