Access for America, Inc. v. Associated Out-Door Clubs, Inc.

188 F. App'x 818
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 2006
Docket05-13856
StatusUnpublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 188 F. App'x 818 (Access for America, Inc. v. Associated Out-Door Clubs, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Access for America, Inc. v. Associated Out-Door Clubs, Inc., 188 F. App'x 818 (11th Cir. 2006).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-Appellants Access for America, Inc., a Florida not for profit corporation (Access) and Doug Wilder, individually (Wilder), filed a complaint pursuant to Title III of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA), against DefendantAppellee Associated Out-Door Clubs, Inc., a Florida corporation d/b/a Tampa Greyhound Track (Track), alleging that the Track discriminated against Wilder and Access by failing to remove certain architectural barriers that impeded Wilder’s wheelchair access to the Track facility. The district court granted Track’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based upon the lack of standing by Access and Wilder to pursue injunctive and declaratory relief under Rule 12(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. This appeal followed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and considered the briefs and the oral arguments of the parties. Based thereupon, we find no error in the district court’s conclusion that, as Wilder lacked the requisite concrete and specific intent to return to the Track because he could not demonstrate that there was any reasonable chance of his revisiting the Track, other than “someday,” he was not entitled to injunctive relief. We also find no error in the district court’s ruling that, because Wilder also failed to prove a threat of future injury, he lacked standing to seek declaratory relief as well.

As Access’ standing was dependent upon Wilder’s standing, Access lacked standing to pursue injunctive and declaratory relief in the district court as well.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wyse v. Caloosa River, Inc.
M.D. Florida, 2024
Scherr v. Marriot International, Inc.
833 F. Supp. 2d 945 (N.D. Illinois, 2011)
Betancourt v. Ingram Park Mall, L.P.
735 F. Supp. 2d 587 (W.D. Texas, 2010)
Betancourt v. Federated Department Stores
732 F. Supp. 2d 693 (W.D. Texas, 2010)
Norkunas v. SEAHORSE NB, LLC
720 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (M.D. Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 F. App'x 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/access-for-america-inc-v-associated-out-door-clubs-inc-ca11-2006.