Acceptance of Gifts and Awards

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel·Decided March 13, 1986·Published

Opinion

U.S. Deparim€ “`~ gof Justice

Off`xce of Legalrt:ounsel Ol`f`loe of the d ‘ Washl'ngton, D.C. 20530 Assistant Aitomey Gensxal MAR l 3 1986

MEMORANDUM FCR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Re: Acceptance of Gifts and Awards by ` Department cf Justice Officials

This memorandum is intended as a summary guide to the receipt and acceptance of gifts and awards by Department of Justice officials. The first part outlines generally applicable laws and Department of Justice regulations. _The second part focuses on particular questions that may arise during your upcoming trip to Southeast Asia. The memorandum is not exhaustive, and is intend- ed only to provide general guidance. Please do not hesitate to call on this Office should you or your staff wish additional assistance in interpreting any particular rule, or advice re- specting the propriety of accepting a particular gift. `

I. .Rules Governing the Acceptance of Gifts by Department of Justice Officials' A. In General

1. 18 U.S.C. 209

-The rul_es governing the acceptance of gifts by departmental officers and employees are der' ved broadly from the criminal

conflict of interest statutes, and from Executive Order 11222.2

l See especially 18 U S. C. 201 (prohibiting the acceptance of .anything of value with the intent to influence an official action .or in return for an official act); 18 U. S. C. 203 (prohibiting the acceptance or sharing of fees derived from a matter involving the federal government when the fee is based on any person' s repre- sentation before a department or agency during the period of the lemployee‘ s government service); 18 U. S. C. 209(a) (prohibiting the acceptance of "any salary, or contribution to or supplementation

of salary, as compensation for” the recipient' s services rendered to the government).

2 30'Fed. Reg. 6469 (1965) ("Prescribing Standards of Ethical

Conduct for Government Officers and Employees").

Of particular importance are the provisions of 18 U. S. C. 209(a}, which prohibit the receipt of "any salary, or any contribution or supplementation of salary, as compensation for . . . services as an officer or employee" of the federal government. For your convenience, a copy of section 209 is appended to this memorandum as Attachment l. Section 209(a) has been interpreted to prohibit the acceptance of anything of value from a nongovernmental rsource that is offered because of one' s government position. Section 209 applies to gifts of tangible property, as well as to

things that might more conventionally be regarded as a supplemen- ` tation of salary.

The applicability of section 209 does not depend upon the existence of a conflict of interest or an appearance of impropri~ ety, and the statute has no de minimis exception. And, it has

been4construed quite strictly by the Office of Government Eth- 1cs.

2. Department of Justice Standards of Conduct

Generally, the Department' s standards of conduct prohibit the acceptance of gifts or other things of "monetary value” in circumstances that may give rise to a conflict of interest. The relevant portions of the standards of conduct are appended as Attachment 2. Gifts generally may not be accepted from persons or entities that do business_or are involved in litigation with the Department of Justice, that are engaged in activities regu~ lated by the Department, or that have “interests that may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee' s official duty." _28 C. F. R. 45. 735 l4(a)(l)-(4).

The standards of conduct also recognize certain specific vexceptions to this general rule, for various situations in which the acceptance of a gift will not, as a practical matter, raise

_any significant appearance of impropriety. These situations

'3 See, e. .g., 5 Op.'O. L. C. 150 (l981)(propriety of prospective

' federal employee' s continued affiliation with his private “employer and its payment of his moving expenses); 4B Op. O. L. C.' 605 (lBBO)(severance agreement between a prospective federal employee and his law firm).

4 See, e. g,, OGE Formal Opinion No. 85 x 4, April 2,1985, advising an agency ethics official that section 209 may bar acceptance of items of appreciation by agency employees for giving speeches in their official capacities to private Organizations.

ihclude gif s from friends and family,5 certain food and re- freshments, loans from banks, and unsolicited adgertising or promotional material of "nominal intrinsic value." Plaques, certificates, and other similar tokens_of appreciation typically have little if any market value and are of limited practical

value to the recipient as well; accordingly, they may be accept- ed.

B. Gifts from Foreign Governments

Gifts from a unit or representative of a foreign government are subject to special rules, which are discussed in part ll infra. In general, officials may accept and retain for their personal use gifts from foreign governments valued at less than $165. Gifts from foreign private donors are subject to the same rules that govern all other gifts under 18 U.S;C. 209 and the Department's standards of conduct.

§ 28 C.F.R. 45.?35-14(€)(1) permits gifts from "a friend, parent, spouse, child or other close relative when the circumstances make it clear that the motivation for the action is a personal or family relationship.'

6 28 C.F.R. 45.735-14(c)(2} provides that`employees may accept "food and refreshment of nominal value 4 . . in the ordinary course of a luncheon Or dinner meeting or other meeting."

7 The standards of conduct do not prohibit "loans from banks or other financial institutions on customary terms of finance for proper and usual activities of employees, such as home mortgage loans," even though the bank or financial institution may do business or be involved in litigation with the Department. See 28 C.F.R. 45. 735.14(c)(3}. 7

Examples of such material of "nominal intrinsic value" are pens, pencils, note pads, and calendars.‘ 28`C. F. R. 45. 735- lé(c)(4). This Office has in the past advised departmental officials that they may accept such items as a pocket calculator worth about $20 (Memorandum from Asistant Attorney General Olson to Deputy- Attorney General Schmults, December 21, 1983), a commemorative pewter ashtray (Memorandum from Assistant Attorney 'General Harmon to the Special Assistant to the Attorney General August 18,1978}, and a chair worth “close to $100" (Memorandum from Assistant Attorney General Olson to Deputy Attorney General Schmults, October 15, 1982). In general, in advising whether a particular item should be_regarded as,having' 'nominal intrinsic value" for purposes of this regulation, we.have tended to take into account both market value and practical value to the recipient. For example, an expensive plague may fall within the category of "nominal instrinsic value," whereas a useful item (e. g., a briefcase or clock) with the same market value may not.

z “

C. Gifts to Superiors

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acceptance of Gifts and Awards, (olc 1986).

Acceptance of Gifts and Awards (Acceptance of Gifts and Awards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related