Accent Delight International Ltd. v. Sotheby's

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 2020
Docket1:18-cv-09011
StatusUnknown

This text of Accent Delight International Ltd. v. Sotheby's (Accent Delight International Ltd. v. Sotheby's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Accent Delight International Ltd. v. Sotheby's, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ACCENT DELIGHT INTERNATIONAL LTD. and XITRANS FINANCE LTD., 18-CV-9011 (JMF) Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] AMENDED -against- PROTECTIVE ORDER

SOTHEBY’S and SOTHEBY’S, INC.,

Defendants.

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: WHEREAS, on March 25, 2016, in In re Accent Delight Int’l Ltd., 16-MC-125 (JMF), plaintiffs in this present action, 18-CV-9011 (JMF) (“Plaintiffs”), filed an application for an order under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (the “First Petition”) to serve subpoenas to obtain documents (the “First Subpoenas”), for use in legal proceedings in France, Monaco, and Singapore; WHEREAS, the Court granted the First Petition, and documents produced in response to and in satisfaction of the First Petition have been deemed produced in this action pursuant to the Court’s Order dated October 23, 2018 [Dkt. #22, No. 18-CV-9011]; WHEREAS, on November 1, 2016, the Court entered a Protective Order (16-MC-125, ECF. No. 84, the “First Section 1782 Protective Order”) which, among other things, governed the disclosure and use of materials produced in connection with the First Petition, which materials are referred to herein as the “Previously Produced Section 1782 Material”; WHEREAS, on February 13, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a second application for an order under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 in In re Application of Accent Delight International Ltd., No. 18-MC-50 (the “Second Petition”) seeking discovery from Sotheby’s, Inc. for use in foreign criminal proceedings in Monaco (Dossier No. no JI no Cab1-2015/04, PG no 2015/000039 (Principality of Monaco)) and Switzerland (Ref. No. P/15776/2017 YBE (Public Prosecutor’s Office, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland)) (collectively, the “Foreign Criminal Proceedings”); WHEREAS, the Second Petition was originally assigned docket number 18-MC-50 but was later consolidated with 16-MC-125;

WHEREAS, on June 11, 2018, the Court granted in part the Second Petition, see Dkt. #163, No. 16-MC-125; WHEREAS, the Court’s decision in connection with the Second Petition was affirmed on appeal; WHEREAS, on June 19, 2018, the Court entered a Protective Order (16-MC-125, Dkt. #169, the “Second Section 1782 Protective Order”), which, among other things, governed the disclosure and use of any materials to be produced in response to the Second Petition; WHEREAS, on October 2, 2018, Plaintiffs filed the present action (the “Action”); WHEREAS, on November 6, 2018, the Court entered an initial Protective Order governing the Action (18-CV-9011 (JMF), Dkt. #26) (the “Initial Protective Order”);

WHEREAS, on January 2, 2020, the Court ordered that “Sotheby’s shall disclose the identities of the sellers of the artworks sold to Bouvier through Sotheby’s,” and that such information “shall be disclosed in the first instance on an Attorney’s Eyes Only basis, subject to challenge by Plaintiffs later in the case as appropriate.” (18-CV-9011 (JMF), Dkt. #134); WHEREAS, on February 28, 2020, upon agreement of the parties, the Court ordered that “[a]ll documents produced by Defendants in this action,” and “[a]ll deposition testimony by employees of Defendants or their affiliated entities in this action,” shall be “deemed produced in response to the Second Petition” (18-CV-9011 (JMF), Dkt. #144); WHEREAS, on February 28, 2020, upon agreement of the parties, the Court ordered that the document production by Defendants in this action and the deposition testimony by employees of Defendants or their affiliated entities in this action (collectively, the “Second Section 1782 Responsive Materials”) “shall constitute a complete response by Sotheby’s, Inc. to the Second

Petition and to any subpoenas or deposition notices served by Plaintiffs in connection therewith” (18-CV-9011 (JMF), Dkt. #144); WHEREAS, the Previously Produced Section 1782 Material and other materials that may be produced in the Action may reflect information that a party or third party asserts is confidential or highly confidential, and therefore requires special protection from public disclosure; WHEREAS, good cause exists for the entry of an amended protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c); WHEREAS, the term “person,” as used in this Protective Order, shall apply to both natural persons and entities;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED THAT, 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 1.1. This Protective Order is intended to cover documents, testimony, and information produced, given, or disclosed by Plaintiffs and Defendants, their officers, directors, corporate parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates (each respectively a “Party,” and collectively the “Parties”), as well as by third parties, in the Action. 1.2. This Protective Order does not confer blanket confidentiality or attorneys’ eyes only protections on all documents, testimony, and information that are produced, given, or disclosed in the Action, and the confidentiality and attorneys’ eyes only protections it affords extends only to the documents, testimony, or information that are designated as confidential or attorneys’ eyes only in accordance with the provisions herein. 2. DESIGNATING CONFIDENTIAL AND ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY MATERIAL 2.1. Any Party may designate as confidential or attorneys’ eyes only any

“Discovery Material” produced in this case. Additionally, any third party may designate as confidential or attorneys’ eyes only any “Discovery Material” that the third party produces in this case. Such “Discovery Material” consists of documents or information produced or disclosed in this case (among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) including, without limitation, the Previously Produced Section 1782 Material, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained. 2.2. Discovery Material that may be designated as “Confidential Material” includes any document or information that reflects or contains: (i) information that must be maintained in confidence pursuant to a confidentiality agreement, contractual provision, or court order; or (ii) trade secrets, proprietary business information, competitively sensitive

information, or other similar information the public disclosure of which would, in the good faith judgment of the person designating the material as confidential, be detrimental to the conduct of that person’s business or the business of any of that person’s customers or clients; or (iii) private personal information pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a), the data privacy laws or regulations of the European Union, or any other applicable data privacy law or regulation. Discovery Material may be designated as Confidential Material by affixing to each page or electronic file to which the designation applies the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” or other similar designation. 2.3. Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following individuals under the following conditions: (i) Parties, counsel for the Parties, and employees of counsel for the Parties; (ii) individual employees of a Party but only to the extent counsel determines in good faith that the employee’s assistance is reasonably necessary for use in the Action;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Accent Delight International Ltd. v. Sotheby's, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/accent-delight-international-ltd-v-sothebys-nysd-2020.