ACCEL SCHOOLS SR LLC v. TRAVONNA HUNTER

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio
DecidedJanuary 15, 2026
Docket3:25-cv-00303
StatusUnknown

This text of ACCEL SCHOOLS SR LLC v. TRAVONNA HUNTER (ACCEL SCHOOLS SR LLC v. TRAVONNA HUNTER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ACCEL SCHOOLS SR LLC v. TRAVONNA HUNTER, (S.D. Ohio 2026).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

ACCEL SCHOOLS SR LLC,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:25-cv-303

vs.

TRAVONNA HUNTER, District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT (Doc. No. 10); (2) SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE; AND (3) PLACING DEFENDANT ON NOTICE THAT IF SHE DOES NOT FILE A TIMELY MOTION, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE GRANTED AND JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT ______________________________________________________________________________

This civil case was filed on September 15, 2025. The docket reflects that Defendant Travonna Hunter was served on September 23, 2025, establishing an answer date of October 14, 2025. Doc. No. 5. Upon that date, Defendant had not answered and, therefore, it appeared Defendant was in default. “When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff filed an application to the Clerk for entry of default against Defendant on October 23, 2025 (Doc. No. 9), and the Clerk of Court put on an entry of default on October 28, 2025 (Doc. No. 10). Then, on December 19, 2025, Defendant filed a pro se letter in response to Plaintiff. Doc. No. 12. Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment on December 22, 2025. Doc. No. 13. The Court liberally construes the letter in Defendant’s favor as a pro se motion for an extension of time to file a motion to set aside the clerk’s entry of default. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976); see United States v. Hawkins, 793 F. App’x 416, 417 n.1 (6th Cir. 2020). For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s request. Defendant shall file her motion and accompanying memorandum to set aside the clerk’s entry of default by February 6, 2026, and Plaintiff shall file their reply by February 20, 2026.

Defendant is placed on NOTICE that if she does not file a timely response, Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment may be granted and entered against her. IT IS SO ORDERED. January 15, 2026 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estelle v. Gamble
429 U.S. 97 (Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ACCEL SCHOOLS SR LLC v. TRAVONNA HUNTER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/accel-schools-sr-llc-v-travonna-hunter-ohsd-2026.