Accardi v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 369 F.2d 805 (Accardi v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court of the United States, in an opinion reported at 383 U.S. 225, 86 S.Ct. 768, 15 L.Ed.2d 717 (1966) reversed our holding at 341 F.2d 72 (1965) and affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, reported at 229 F.Supp. 193 (1964) in which it had been held, as stated by the Supreme Court, “ * * * that petitioners are entitled to recover from the railroad the stipulated damages due them because they are entitled to credit for the full amount of time served in the armed forces in calculating their severance pay.” 383 U.S. 225, at 233, 86 S.Ct. at 773. The stipulation provided that if the six plaintiffs prevailed, each of them was entitled to $1,242.60 more seveiance pay than he had received.
The cause was remanded to our court, however, for our consideration of the claim by appellant, Pennsylvania Railroad Company, that the district court erred when, at the time judgment was entered on May 22, 1964, each plaintiff was awarded interest at 5% upon $1,242.60 from November 1, 1961, the first day of the first month after each plaintiff received the last installment of the separation allowance the appellant had paid him, to the date of the judgment. The appellant maintains that, if any pre judgment interest is properly allowable in this case, it should be allowable only from the date of the commencement of the action, January 23, 1964.
We find no error in the discretionary allowance of this pre judgment interest by the district judge, and we affirm the awards of interest made by the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
369 F.2d 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/accardi-v-pennsylvania-railroad-ca2-1966.