A.C. v. K.M.E.

Missouri Court of Appeals

A.C. v. K.M.E.

534 S.W.3d 424

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 12, 2017

DocketWD 80646

StatusPublished

This text of 534 S.W.3d 424 (A.C. v. K.M.E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.C. v. K.M.E., 534 S.W.3d 424 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

K.M.E. appeals from the circuit court’s judgment terminating her parental lights to her daughter, A.M.R.C. She contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment, and the judgment was against the weight of the evidence. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

K.M.E. appeals from the circuit court’s judgment terminating her parental lights to her daughter, A.M.R.C. She contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment, and the judgment was against the weight of the evidence. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 S.W.3d 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ac-v-kme-moctapp-2017.