A.C. v. K.M.E.

Missouri Court of Appeals

A.C. v. K.M.E.

534 S.W.3d 424

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 12, 2017·No. WD 80646·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

K.M.E. appeals from the circuit court’s judgment terminating her parental lights to her daughter, A.M.R.C. She contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment, and the judgment was against the weight of the evidence. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

K.M.E. appeals from the circuit court’s judgment terminating her parental lights to her daughter, A.M.R.C. She contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment, and the judgment was against the weight of the evidence. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

A.C. v. K.M.E., 534 S.W.3d 424 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

534 S.W.3d 424 (A.C. v. K.M.E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.