Abuvala v. Abuvala

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Abuvala v. Abuvala

958 So. 2d 999, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8177, 2007 WL 1518300

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 25, 2007

DocketNo. 1D07-0311

StatusPublished

This text of 958 So. 2d 999 (Abuvala v. Abuvala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abuvala v. Abuvala, 958 So. 2d 999, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8177, 2007 WL 1518300 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 26, 2007, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature. Specifically, because judicial labor remains with regard to distribution of the property identified in paragraphs 15 and 46 of the order, the order is not a final order. See generally Caufield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002) (“[a] final judgment is one which ends the litigation between the parties and disposes of all issues involved such that no further action by the court will be necessary”); Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (dismissing appeal from order of dissolution of marriage that reserved jurisdiction to determine equitable distribution). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

[1000]*1000In light of the dismissal, the appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time, filed on March 7, 2007, is hereby denied as moot.

LEWIS, POLSTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 26, 2007, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature. Specifically, because judicial labor remains with regard to distribution of the property identified in paragraphs 15 and 46 of the order, the order is not a final order. See generally Caufield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002) (“[a] final judgment is one which ends the litigation between the parties and disposes of all issues involved such that no further action by the court will be necessary”); Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (dismissing appeal from order of dissolution of marriage that reserved jurisdiction to determine equitable distribution). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

[1000]*1000In light of the dismissal, the appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time, filed on March 7, 2007, is hereby denied as moot.

LEWIS, POLSTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

958 So. 2d 999, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8177, 2007 WL 1518300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abuvala-v-abuvala-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack