Abusikin v. City of New York
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED GARELABI ABUSIKIN, DOC —_______ DATE FILED: 6/30/2020 Plaintiff, -against- 18 Civ. 4582 (AT) (KNF) THE CITY OF NEW YORK, POLICE OFFICER ORDER MIRJAN LOLJA, and JOHN DOES 1-2, Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), ECF No. 85, of the Honorable Kevin Nathaniel Fox, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error, and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for sanctions pursuant to Rules 41, 37(b) and 30(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay $250.00 to Defendants as a sanction for violation of Judge Fox’s November 19, 2019 order, ECF No. 57. See R&R at 15. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 60. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2020 New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abusikin v. City of New York (Abusikin v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.