Aburumuh v. State of Utah

District Court, D. Utah·Decided October 2, 2025·No. 4:25-cv-00025·Unknown

Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

SAMMY ABURUMUH, MEMORANDUM DECISION & Petitioner, DISMISSAL ORDER

v. Case No. 4:25-CV-25-DN STATE OF UTAH, District Judge David Nuffer Respondent.

On August 27, 2025, the Court ordered Petitioner to within thirty days show cause why this federal habeas petition should not be dismissed under the exhaustion and abstention doctrines. (ECF No. 12.) Petitioner has not responded. Indeed, Petitioner has not been heard from since his financial certificate was filed on April 18, 2025--nearly six months ago. (ECF No. 11.) And the last item of mail sent to Petitioner by the Court was returned to sender, marked, "No longer at this address." (ECF No. 13.) IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 US. 626, 630-31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003). This action is CLOSED. DATED this 294 __ day of October, 2025. BY THE COURT:

JUDGE DAVID Mud United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aburumuh v. State of Utah, (D. Utah 2025).

Aburumuh v. State of Utah (Aburumuh v. State of Utah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olsen v. Mapes
333 F.3d 1199 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)