Abud v. Saad and Alegre
This text of Abud v. Saad and Alegre (Abud v. Saad and Alegre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 5, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D16-2435 Lower Tribunal No. 09-41811 ________________
Charbel Abud, Appellant,
vs.
Maria Isabel Saad and Gabriella Alegre, Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, John Schlesinger, Judge.
Carrillo & Carrillo, Pedro R. Carrillo and Felix R. Carrillo; Arnaldo Velez, for appellant.
Alexis Gonzalez and Gustavo Sardiña, for appellees.
Before EMAS, LOGUE and LUCK, JJ.
EMAS, J. The case below involved an action for breach of contract and declaratory
judgment, following an unconsummated real estate transaction between Charbel
Abud (the Seller) and Maria Isabel Saad and Gabriella Alegre (the Buyers).
Following discovery, both sides filed motions for summary judgment and,
following a hearing, the trial court entered final summary judgment in favor of the
Buyers.
Upon our de novo review, Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach,
L.P., 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000), we affirm, holding that the trial court correctly
determined there were no material issues of disputed fact and that, as a matter of
law, the Buyers’ communications with the Seller constituted timely and proper
cancellation of the contract pursuant to its terms.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abud v. Saad and Alegre, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abud-v-saad-and-alegre-fladistctapp-2017.