Abts Vs. Arnold-Abts

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 16, 2020
Docket81297
StatusPublished

This text of Abts Vs. Arnold-Abts (Abts Vs. Arnold-Abts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abts Vs. Arnold-Abts, (Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BRANDI ABTS, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 81296 Appellant, vs. CYNTHIA ARNOLD-ABTS, Res s ondent. BRANDI ABTS, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 81297/ Appellant, vs. FILED CYNTHIA ARNOLD-ABTS, Respondent. JUL 16 620 ELIZABETS-s A. BROWN OLE' 'PRUE BY Cs E. ' ERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS

These are pro se appeals from a district court order granting a motion to set aside a default judgment and a district court order dismissing certain claims and allowing appellant to amend her complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge. Review of the notices of appeal and documents before this court reveals jurisdictional defects. The order granting a motion to set aside a default judgment is not an independently appealable order. See Estate of Adams v. Fallini, 132 Nev. 814, 818, 386 P.3d 621, 624 (2016). Further, an order dismissing some, but not all, claims and allowing appellant to amend her complaint is not appealable as a final judgment. See NRAP 3A(b)(1); Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment); Bergenfield v. BAC Horne Loan Servicing, 131 Nev. 683, 354 P.3d 1282 (2015) (an order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final judgment). And no other statute or court rule appears to allow an appeal from such an order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over these appeals and orders them dismissed. However, the orders challenged in these appeals are subject to review in the context of appellant's appeal from the final judgment, on appeal in Docket No. 81298. It is so ORDERED.'

02-546%,r-73. Parraguirre

J. 64IK' J. Hardesty Cadish

cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Brandi Abts Patricia A. Marr, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk

'This court takes no action on the pro se transcript request forms filed on June 24, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC
301 P.3d 850 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)
Lee v. GNLV CORP.
996 P.2d 416 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Abts Vs. Arnold-Abts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abts-vs-arnold-abts-nev-2020.