Abts v. Abts

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 16, 2018·No. 75423·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BRANDI ABTS, No. 75423 vs. Appellant,

FILED

CYNTHIA ARNOLD ABTS,

Respondent. APR 152018 ctflorrOrcr

Ri

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL eveEptily CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from an order granting a motion to set aside a default judgment pursuant to NRCP 60(b). Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NR,AP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears that it was filed before the entry of a final written judgment, and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark ety. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987). A premature notice of appeal filed before entry of a final, written judgment is of no effect, and a district court's oral pronouncement from the bench, a minute order, and even an unfiled written order are ineffective for any purpose. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Cherry

a k2ArtA-7,/-

(1 '

,J.

SUPREME COURT Stiglich

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2- r131;

cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Brandi Abts Patricia A. Marc Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

DJ 1947A e 2

481 ;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abts v. Abts, (Neb. 2018).

Abts v. Abts (Abts v. Abts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rust v. Clark County School District
747 P.2d 1380 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1987)