A.B.T. Corp. v. City of Fort Lauderdale

533 So. 2d 1208, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2607, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5267
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 1988·No. Nos. 87-2399, 87-2400·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only issue raised in this appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s entering final judgment while a non-final appeal was pending in this court. Rule 9.130(f) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that a final judgment may not be entered under such circumstances:

In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a non-final order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matters, including trial or final hearing; provided that the lower tribunal may not render a final order disposing of the cause pending such review.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that the final judgment be vacated, and without prejudice to the trial court to enter final judgment upon the ter-[1209] initiation of the pending non-final appeal.1

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A.B.T. Corp. v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 533 So. 2d 1208, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2607, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5267 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

533 So. 2d 1208 (A.B.T. Corp. v. City of Fort Lauderdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Imperatore v. Nationsbank of Florida
677 So. 2d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Connor Realty, Inc. v. OCEAN TERRACE NORTH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
572 So. 2d 4 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)