Abt-Bernot, Inc. v. Holland-American Line

126 Misc. 7, 211 N.Y.S. 736, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1024
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 3, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 126 Misc. 7 (Abt-Bernot, Inc. v. Holland-American Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abt-Bernot, Inc. v. Holland-American Line, 126 Misc. 7, 211 N.Y.S. 736, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1024 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1925).

Opinion

Wagner, J.

The defense set up in paragraph 8 of the answer is insufficient because it is hypothetical, and because it is a plea in the alternative, and because it fails to set forth the ultimate facts upon which defendant relies to be relieved of liability.

The plea of confession and avoidance requires a definite admission and a statement of ultimate facts which, if established, exonerate the defendant of liability.

The motion to strike out paragraph 8 is granted, with leave to defendant to serve an amended answer within twenty days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 Misc. 7, 211 N.Y.S. 736, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abt-bernot-inc-v-holland-american-line-nysupct-1925.