Abt-Bernot, Inc. v. Holland-American Line
This text of 126 Misc. 7 (Abt-Bernot, Inc. v. Holland-American Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defense set up in paragraph 8 of the answer is insufficient because it is hypothetical, and because it is a plea in the alternative, and because it fails to set forth the ultimate facts upon which defendant relies to be relieved of liability.
The plea of confession and avoidance requires a definite admission and a statement of ultimate facts which, if established, exonerate the defendant of liability.
The motion to strike out paragraph 8 is granted, with leave to defendant to serve an amended answer within twenty days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 Misc. 7, 211 N.Y.S. 736, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abt-bernot-inc-v-holland-american-line-nysupct-1925.