Abruzzo v. Haller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Abruzzo v. Haller

682 So. 2d 228, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12421, 1996 WL 640568

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 1996

DocketNo. 96-773

StatusPublished

This text of 682 So. 2d 228 (Abruzzo v. Haller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abruzzo v. Haller, 682 So. 2d 228, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12421, 1996 WL 640568 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant failed to pay the applicable clerk’s fee due as a result of the transfer of his action to the proper court, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the instant action without prejudice pursuant to rule 1.060(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See, Burke Co. v. United States Tel. Co., 571 So.2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant failed to pay the applicable clerk’s fee due as a result of the transfer of his action to the proper court, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the instant action without prejudice pursuant to rule 1.060(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See, Burke Co. v. United States Tel. Co., 571 So.2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

682 So. 2d 228, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12421, 1996 WL 640568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abruzzo-v-haller-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack