Abruzzo v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abruzzo v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.

261 A.D. 830, 24 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7657

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 20, 1941·Published

Opinion

Action for damages for personal injuries suffered by the infant plaintiff while attempting to board a truck owned and operated by the defendant, and by his mother for loss of services and medical expenses. The trial court found that the infant plaintiff was an employee of the defendant at the time the accident happened and that his remedy was by recourse to the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The judgment dismissing the complaint is unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Lesser v. Holland Farms, Inc., 248 App. Div. 323; affd., 273 N. Y. 558.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for damages for personal injuries suffered by the infant plaintiff while attempting to board a truck owned and operated by the defendant, and by his mother for loss of services and medical expenses. The trial court found that the infant plaintiff was an employee of the defendant at the time the accident happened and that his remedy was by recourse to the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The judgment dismissing the complaint is unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Lesser v. Holland Farms, Inc., 248 App. Div. 323; affd., 273 N. Y. 558.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Abruzzo v. Grandview Dairy, Inc., 261 A.D. 830, 24 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 830 (Abruzzo v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related